The following few posts will seek to answer that question. A course will be charted between the Scylla of modernism’s foundationalist truth and the Charybdis of postmodernism’s destruction of truth. Christianity offers an alternative paradigm on the nature of truth. The goal of this paper will be to examine the Biblical teaching of truth as found in the Gospel of John. First, it will be shown that the nature of truth is founded upon the Trinitarian God of Christianity and His Word. Secondly, it will be argued that the possibility of the knowledge of truth is founded on the nature of Scriptural truth. Thirdly, given the nature and knowability of truth there follows an oughtness of truth, which will be set forth. These three elements or perspectives on truth stand together as a construction of the biblical notion of truth.[5] Lastly a few applications to the postmodern situation will be set forth in seeking an alternate Christian paradigm.
[1] J. Richard Middleton and Brian J. Walsh. Truth is Stranger That It Used to Be: Biblical Faith in a Postmodern Age.
[2] For a detailed examination of this shift see the following: D. A. Carson. The Gagging of God: Christianity Confronts Pluralism.
[3] Philip D. Kenneson. “There’s No Such Thing as Objective Truth, and It’s a Good Thing, Too.” In Timothy R. Phillips and Dennis L. Okholm. Christian Apologetics in the Postmodern World.
[4] Douglas Groothuis. Truth Decay: Defending Christianity Against the Challenges of Postmodernism.
[5] My indebtedness to John Frame will be evident throughout this paper even when not directly cited. It is the hope of this paper to add some Biblical meat to his theological arguments. By this I mean adding more of an exegetical flavor to the argument through an understanding of truth as found in the Gospel of John. See his The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God.
4 comments:
Sounds interesting.
Looking forward to the papers.
Wow, citations in a blog! Dr. Parker says post modernism is on it's second to last breath.
Even if pomo is on the way out (which I am not yet willing to concede) it will still leave behind it a trail of ravaged and upturned adherents and ardent followers for many years to come.
I would be curious to see if Parker is referring to pomo on its last breath in the academic community or in its popular forms? Would you be able to find out for me? I never had the oppurtunity to sit under Parker while I was at SBTS. I did have Wellum and these posts are fruit from that course.
If there is no truth, does that mean there are no lies? But if there are no lies, then how can it be a lie to say that absolute truth exists?
Post a Comment